|
LSR's Covert Detective,
"Sleuth", Reveals The Reasons Why Not to Buy.
"Sleuth", while posting under the alias, "otcbb_sleuth" on the
Raging Bull message board community, has been amazingly accurate in
identifying overpriced issues trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. His
record is nothing short of spectacular. To date, all issues, on
which he has offered an opinion at Raging Bull, have suffered
dramatic price declines subsequent to his posts. We are pleased to
have him on our team.
Jupiter Enterprises, Inc.
(OTCBB: JPEN) January 29, 2002 Current Price:
$5.25 Market Cap: Approximately 205 million
dollars
By: Sleuth
Can You Believe A $200,000,000 OTCBB Shell Deal?
The Acquisition of BEIJING MINGHE-HAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
CO., LTD. By JUPITER ENTERPRISES, INC. Creates a $200,000,000
Industrial Powerhouse???
The story of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. ("JPEN") appears pretty
straightforward. On November 28, 2001 JPEN entered into an agreement
to acquire a Chinese company, Beijing Minghe-Han Science and
Technology Co., Ltd. ("MHST") in a typical reverse merger into a
public shell transaction.
The terms are pretty straightforward as well. The holders of JPEN
will retain their 3.042M shares and issue 10M new shares to the
holders of MHST, resulting in an approximate 23% - 77% ownership
split. As a result of gaining a controlling interest in JPEN, the
officers and directors of MHST are to replace the officers and
directors of JPEN.
Where the story gets really interesting, inspiring further
inquiry by Sleuth, is when on December 4, 2001, JPEN announces a 3
for 1 forward split. The split will simultaneously increase the
number of outstanding shares from just over 13M to over 39M, and
reduce the cost-basis of the JPEN holders stock by a factor of 3.
The Facts of the JPEN Case:
A BRIEF HISTORY
Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. ("JPEN") was incorporated on March 12,
1999 in the state of Nevada.
JPEN remains a development stage enterprise, limiting its
activities to the formation and raising of equity capital and
remaining current with its filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, until merging with MHST on November 28, 2001.
Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between JPEN
and MHST and the shareholders of MHST, JPEN acquired 100% of the
shares of MHST, in exchange for an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of
JPEN's common stock. As a result, MHST becomes a wholly-owned
subsidiary of JPEN.
Simultaneously with the Agreement between the parties, and
effective November 28, 2001, the officers and directors of Jupiter
resigned, and Yin Mingshan, the Chairman of MingHe-Han, became the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Jupiter and Michael Harrop
became a director and the President and Secretary of Jupiter.
Alexander Chen was also appointed Director and Treasurer.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (From JPEN Press Release of 11/29/01)
MHST was the first company to import and utilize lightweight
steel building fabrication systems in the Chinese building and
construction industry. MHST has designed, fabricated, and built over
1,000,000 square meters of commercial, office and warehouse
buildings including the 60,000 square meter Daewoo plant in Shandong
Province and the 90,0000 square meter Fujian Automobile Plant in
Fujian Province.
MHST is ISO 9002 certified for the production, installation and
servicing of steel structures, grid structures and arch structures.
PLAN OF OPERATIONS (From JPEN Press Release of 11/29/01)
MHST plans to design and fabricate approximately 250,000 square
meters of light and heavy industrial buildings per year, over the
next five years, as part of the Beijing Olympics Factory Relocation
Program. MingHe-Han also plans to bid on additional infrastructure
and facility contracts that may be awarded as part of the Chinese
$20 billion dollar Beijing Olympics infrastructure investment
commitment.
CAPITALIZATION
03/30/99 Shares issued for cash: 2,000,000 shares @ $0.005 per
share for $10,000 05/27/99 Shares issued for cash: 840,000
shares @ $0.03 per share for $25,200 06/20/00 Shares issued for
cash: 202,000 shares @ $0.03 per share for $6,060
Pre-merger total: 3,042,000 shares issued for $41,260 (average
price of approximately $.003 per share)
11/28/01 Shares issued for 100% of MHST stock: 10,000,000 shares
Post merger total: 13,042,000 shares
12/10/01 3 for 1 forward stock split
Post split total: 39,126,000 shares
SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET DATA (9/30/01)
TOTAL ASSETS $1,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES $19,302
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ (18,113)
RECENT ANNOUNCMENTS:
Friday January 25, 11:43 am Eastern Time
Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. - U.S. Log Home Manufacturer's Paving
Path to 2008 Olympics
Preliminary Delivery & Financing Agreements Signed to Build
Beijing Olympia Villa's for Jupiter Enterprises, Inc.
VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 25, 2002--
Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (OTCBB:JPEN) announced today that it has
signed preliminary agreements with Precision Craft Log Homes in
Idaho and Original Log Homes in North Carolina for the delivery of
phase one, 200 log homes, for the Olympia Villa's real estate
development located in the Shunyi district of Beijing, China. Both
manufacturers are able to arrange export financing.
The total development will consist of 1100 high-tech log homes
ranging in size from 2000 - 4000 square feet. A portion of the
development is being offered in conjunction with the district of
Shunyi to house international athletes participating in the 2008
Beijing Olympic Games. Jupiter recently entered into a joint-venture
partnership ("JVP") with the development arm of the District of
Shunyi in the city of Beijing to develop the project.
Michael Harrop, chairman of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. was noted
saying "Jupiter is moving aggressively forward in it's role
developing projects integral to the 2008 Olympic's master plan." He
adds "We were all very pleased that our CEO, Yin Mingshen, made
significant in-roads with tow of America's finest log home
manufacturers." Precision Craft is the largest manufacturer of log
homes in the U.S. and Original Log Homes has experience bringing log
homes into Asian markets.
Groundbreaking estimated to begin in early spring 2002, and phase
one delivery of 200 log homes and primary clubhouse area is
anticipated to be in early July 2002.
Wednesday January 9, 8:59 am Eastern Time
Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. To Build Olympia Villas in Beijing,
China
VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 9,
2002--Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (OTCBB:JPEN) announces that its
wholly-owned subsidiary, MingHe-Han S & T Co., Ltd., Beijing,
Peoples' Republic of China, has agreed to act as General Contractor
to construct 1100 high-tech log homes, a portion of which will be
offered to house athletes from around the globe participating in the
2008 Olympic games. MingHe-Han has entered into this agreement with
Beijing Shunyi Dalong Chengxiang Construction and Development
Corporation, the real estate development arm of the District
Government of Shunyi, Beijing City. Groundbreaking is scheduled to
begin in early spring 2002.
MingHe-Han is currently negotiating details for Phase One of the
construction project, which will include development of 200 log
homes and the primary clubhouse area. Each log home will average
3500 square feet and will include high-speed internet access and
international style interiors. The Olympia Villas project is being
built in the District of Shunyi, Beijing City. The District will be
host to 46 gold medal Olympic events. The Olympia Villas project
directly adjoins the Wenyu River, where many of the Olympic water
sports events will be held.
"This is an important step in Jupiter's development" comments
chairman of Jupiter Enterprises, Inc., Michael Harrop, "We hope that
this is only the first of many construction projects that we will be
taking part in as the City of Beijing prepares for the 2008
Olympics. Participating with the district of Shunyi, which will host
a number of Olympic venues, offers Jupiter a good position from
which to access the many building projects needed for the Games. We
are honored to have been selected to partner directly with the
district of Shunyi, directed by Mayor Zhou."
Tuesday December 11, 9:15 am Eastern Time
Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. Common Stock Commences To Trade on
Post-Split Basis Today
VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 11,
2001--Jupiter Enterprises, Inc. (OTCBB: JPEN), which recently
acquired a 100% interest in Beijing MingHe-Han Science and
Technology Co., Ltd., a private Chinese steel fabrication
corporation ("MingHe-Han"), announces that the previously announced
3-for-1 forward-split of its outstanding common stock became
effective at 5:00 p.m., E.S.T. on December 10, 2001. Shares of the
Company's common stock will commence to trade on a post-split basis
today. There is no change in the number of shares the Company is
authorized to issue or the par value per share. The Company's common
stock will continue to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board under the
symbol "JPEN".
The Company's independent transfer agent will be mailing
certificates representing the additional shares to shareholders of
record as of the effective date/time.
SLEUTH'S TAKE ON THE FACTS
So what do we know about this new JPEN:
1) We know that the owners of the former JPEN shell now own
9,126,000 shares (post merger and post split) of JPEN common valued
at nearly $48,000,000 ($5.25 per share * 9.126M shares).
2) We know that they paid $41,260 for their shares and if they
were able to sell every share at this price they would gross nearly
$50 million on their initial investment of $41,260 and their return
on investment would be 116,000%. That number is not a misprint. It
is correct, one hundred and sixteen thousand percent on $41,260
invested in 1999 (less than three years ago).
3) We know that 8.52M of those shares have been held for more
than two years and are potentially sellable under rule 144K which
provides for a "virtual" registration of shares through the removal
of the restrictive legend and the total cost of those shares was
only $35,200.
4) We know that another 606,000 shares (with a cost basis of
$6,060) which were issued in June 2000, have been held for over 1
year and are potentially sellable under rule 144 with proper
disclosure.
5) We know from a reading of the 8K filed on December 14,
disclosing the transaction, that the owners of the former JPEN were
not required to execute lock-up agreements restricting their shares
beyond the normal 1934 act restrictions.
6) Although no MHST financial information was disclosed, we do
know that its owners agreed to merge with an empty JPEN shell in
return for only 77% of the combined entity. By implication, the
distribution of ownership places an upper limit on either the value
of MHST or the wisdom of its owners (or both).
7) We "know" (depends on how much credence one wants to put in
JPEN's press releases) from the January 9, 2002 press release that
MHST will act as General Contractor to build 200 Phase One (subject
to continued negotiation) high-tech, log homes of approximately
3,500 square feet in Beijing City. The release also says that MHST
is to build 1,100 such homes in preparation for the 2008 Olympics.
SLEUTH'S BOTTOM LINE
Let's, for a moment, put the best possible light on the deal. I
mean 1,100 Olympic Village log homes in Beijing City, over the next
5 or 6 years is real business. Eleven hundred homes @ $350K per home
is $400 million in General Contractor revenue over the next 5 years.
That's $80 million per year.
But look at US homebuilders, that are General Contractors ("GC")
(and real estate developers and architects) to get a sense of what
value should be placed on $80 million per year in GC revenue.
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: HOV) had revenues of $1.7
billion and earnings of $64 million for twelve months ending
10/31/01. At its present price of $21.48 per share (very near its 52
week high of $22.03), HOV has a market capitalization of $595
million.
Toll Brothers, Inc. (NYSE: TOL) had revenues of $2.23 billion and
spectacular earnings of $214 million for twelve months ending
10/31/01. At its present share price of $45.45, TOL has a market cap
of $1.56 billion.
Back to shining the best light. Assume that MHST is 1 / 10th the
size of HOV attributing $170 million in trailing twelve month
revenues and $6 million in trailing earnings to MHST. If that
assumption is true, then JPEN should have a corresponding market
value of just under $60 million. With nearly 40 million shares of
JPEN outstanding, a $60 million market cap translates into $1.50 per
share.
As I see it, that $1.50 per share is the best case
present value of JPEN shares.
On a worst case basis, just imagine how you would act if you were
lucky enough to have been able to buy some of those 9.126 million
shares @ $.001. Just imagine how aggressive a seller you would be @
$5 per share or @ $4 per share or @ $3 per share or @ $.50 per
share. You get my drift.
Barring MHST consisting of some remarkable intrinsic value, you
can bet I'd be turning my old JPEN stock into good old US dollars as
quickly as I could say SELL, SELL, SELL.
DISCLAIMER:
I do not guarantee in any way that I am providing all of the
information that may be available and relevant to any investment
decisions you may make. I recommend that you do your own due
diligence before buying or selling any security.
At any time I may and frequently will hold a position in any of
the securities profiled in Sleuth's Case. I will not report when a
position is initiated or covered. Each investor must make that
decision based on his/her judgment of the market.
To contact Sleuth directly, send inquiries
to:
otcbb_sleuth@excite.com
Converge Global, Inc. (OTCBB:
CVRG) January 28, 2002 Current Price: 1.09 Market
Cap: Approximately 9.1 million
dollars
By: Sleuth
From the Ashes, The Phoenix? Converge Global,
Inc., Flying From $.08 to $1.09 In Two Weeks
Rewind the clock to January 11. Converge Global, Inc. (CVRG)
trades 100 shares @ $.08. That’s right 100 shares, not 100K shares
but 100 shares. On a dollar volume basis that’s 8 bucks. After the
trade, the seller owes the broker because the commission is more
than the $8 proceeds of the sale.
A quick glance at CVRG’s trading history reveals that January 11
is no fluke. In fact on December 31, CVRG trades a mere 500 shares @
$.08 and then trades only those infamous 100 shares on Jan. 11 until
the fireworks begin on Jan. 18th. CVRG opens @ $.21 (up 162.5% from
its previous close) on the 18th, trades as high as $.69, closes @
$.48 on over 500,000 shares and sets a new bullish tone for the
stock.
Which is exactly what piques the curiosity of yours truly, so
lets have a look.
The Facts of the CVRG Case:
A BRIEF HISTORY (From 10K filed on 4/16/01)
The corporation was incorporated under the laws of the State of
Utah, on October 4, 1985, under the name of Mormon Mint, Inc. In
1998, the Company changed its name to Capital Placement Specialists,
Inc. as it began to seek new business opportunities.
Pursuant to an Acquisition Agreement, dated January 5, 1999,
Bekam Investments, Ltd. ("Bekam") acquired 100% of the common shares
of the Company at that time; or 2,340,100 shares. Bekam subsequently
spun off the Company by distributing the shares to select investors
of Bekam. The Company then changed its name to Converge Global, Inc.
("Converge" or the "Company").
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (From 10K filed on 4/16/01)
The Company's business has been focused in the electronic
commerce ("e- commerce") industry, developing specialty websites
catering to niche market segments, as well as building a market that
provides complete e-commerce solutions to other businesses. While
the Company plans to continue to operate DigitalMen.com in the near
term, we have discontinued development of our other web site
projects, LiquidationBid.com, DesiTV.com, and Machmail.com. Due to
the recent downturn in the web site and internet industry, we are
now pursuing other opportunities in the technology sector. We have
not yet identified any specific opportunities, but such
opportunities could include our own development of or acquisitions
of or some other type of relationship with third party companies in
the hardware and software industries. We will also consider other
applications in the Internet industry.
PLAN OF OPERATIONS (From 10Q filed on 11/19/01)
With the winding down of continued development of
LiquidationBid.com, DesiTV.com, and Machmail.com, the Company's cash
requirements for the next twelve months have decreased from
approximately $40,000 per month last year to approximately $15,000
per month currently. With a $250,000 line of credit granted by a
director (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources"), the Company should
be able to continue its operations for the next twelve months.
However, due to the downturn in the website development and
e-commerce industry, the Company has begun to seek candidates in
other industries for potential merger, acquisition, or joint venture
(collectively, a "business combination"). The Company is targeting
other technology companies for a potential business combination, but
will consider any candidate with the potential for or actual revenue
generation… Should the Company fail to locate and complete a
business combination, the Company believes that it will not generate
any revenues and it will be forced to curtail its growth, cut back
by reducing the number of employees or even cease operations
altogether.
CAPITALIZATION From inception through Dec. 31, 1996 (total
outstanding 2,079,000): 2,079,000 shares issued in exchange for
services valued at $88,060.00 or $.0424 per share Year ending
Dec. 31, 1997(total outstanding 2,340,100): 261,100 shares
issued in exchange for services valued at $26,110 or $.10 per share
Year ending Dec. 31, 1998 (total outstanding 2,340,100):
Year ending Dec. 31, 1999 (total outstanding 8,918,100):
78,000 shares issued in exchange for services valued at $780 or
$.01 per share 2,000,000 shares issued to officers and directors
via option exercise for $2,000 or $.001 per share 2,500,000
shares issued to an investment group for $25,000 or $.01 per share
2,000,000 shares issued to an investment group via option
exercise for $200,000 or $.10 per share Year ending Dec. 31,
2000 (total outstanding 8,918,100 for $370,050 or $.0415 per share):
SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET DATA (9/30/01)
Cash $12,286 Fixed assets $ 197,906 TOTAL ASSETS $210,192
Current liabilities: Accrued Expenses $ 209,074 Loans
Payable $ 192,764 TOTAL LIABILITIES $401,838
MINORITY INTEREST $276,481
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ (468,127)
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Quarter ending 9/30/01)
Sales $0 Cost of Goods Sold $0 Gross Profit $0
Operating expenses $ 25,494 LOSS FROM OPERATIONS $(25,461)
EMPLOYEES
As of the April 16, 2001, the Company employs four full-time
employees and no part-time employees.
RECENT ANNOUNCMENTS:
Friday January 18, 9:01 am Eastern Time SOURCE: Converge
Global, Inc.
Converge Global, Inc. Signs Letter of Intent to Acquire TeleWrx,
Inc.
SANTA MONICA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 18, 2002--Converge
Global, Inc. (OTCBB:CVRG) has signed a Letter of Intent that could
result in TeleWrx, Inc., a Florida corporation, becoming a wholly
owned subsidiary.
Converge Global has completed preliminary due diligence and the
parties have agreed to work toward closing the transaction within
the next few weeks.
Mr. Imran Husain of Converge Global said, ``We are very fortunate
to have come to an understanding with TeleWrx, Inc. and its
President Michael Brown. We believe that TeleWrx, Inc., as part of a
public company, with additional financing, has the potential for
very dynamic growth.''
TeleWrx is a communications company specializing in the sales and
marketing of telecommunications products and services through the
utilization of network marketing. The Company offers residential and
small business long-distance, Internet dialup (56K), calling cards,
toll-free service and wireless services including WAP (wireless
application protocol) devices.
Home-based businesses have enjoyed explosive growth and experts
predict that this growth will be fueled by the expanding markets and
new technology in the telecommunications industry. TeleWrx has
negotiated partnership agreements with telecommunication and
technology industry leaders in order to offer its agents and
consumers cutting edge services at the most competitive prices.
The terms of the transaction are subject to final negotiation.
Even though the parties have spent considerable time and effort to
review the potential transaction and the basic terms for its
completion have been agreed to, there are still important due
diligence items to be reviewed by both parties. Therefore there can
be no assurance that this transaction will be completed in a timely
manner, if at all. Additionally, the terms and conditions of the
final agreement could vary substantially from those contemplated in
the Letter of Intent.
SLEUTH’S TAKE ON THE FACTS
The easy part of the CVRG story to understand is the pre-January
18th part. At that point the Company is just one more failed dot-com
that basically exists as a public shell looking for its next
opportunity. And the pre-January 18th trading pattern is rational
and consistent with that reality. The reality being that CVRG is a
public shell, with no operating business and approximately 8,000,000
shares of stock outstanding. At $.08 per share that equates to a
$640,000 market capitalization, a slight premium over the market
price of public shells but within reason. And its trading volume (or
lack there of) makes sense as well.
It’s when the really big news (did I say that?) comes out on
January 18th that all hell breaks loose. And what is this really big
news? Well there it is in plain black and white:
Converge Global, Inc. Signs Letter of Intent to Acquire TeleWrx,
Inc.
Then, WHAM, within 7 days CVRG is worth 1200% more than before
the announcement. OK, lets give the benefit of the doubt to CVRG and
drill into the announcement for the substance of the deal.
CVRG PR: Converge Global, Inc. has signed a Letter of Intent
that could result in TeleWrx, Inc., a Florida corporation, becoming
a wholly owned subsidiary.
SLEUTH’S TAKE: Letter of Intent that could result in is the key
phrase. It means just what it says, Letter of Intent that could
result in, and that between now and consummation of the deal, many
things could blow up, and CVRG goes back to being nothing but an
empty shell searching for its next opportunity.
CVRG PR: Converge Global has completed preliminary due diligence
and the parties have agreed to work toward closing the transaction
within the next few weeks.
SLEUTH’S TAKE: I suppose investors are supposed to take comfort
from CVRG having completed preliminary due diligence and that the
parties have agreed to work toward closing the transaction.
CVRG PR: "TeleWrx is a communications company specializing in the
sales and marketing of telecommunications products and services
through the utilization of network marketing."
SLEUTH’S TAKE: I guess by utilizing network marketing, TeleWrx is
the Amway of telecommunications services.
CVRG PR: The terms of the transaction are subject to final
negotiation. Even though the parties have spent considerable time
and effort to review the potential transaction and the basic terms
for its completion have been agreed to, there are still important
due diligence items to be reviewed by both parties. Therefore there
can be no assurance that this transaction will be completed in a
timely manner, if at all. Additionally, the terms and conditions of
the final agreement could vary substantially from those contemplated
in the Letter of Intent.
SLEUTH’S TAKE: This paragraph is as telling for what it says as
for what it doesn’t say. It explicitly re-enforces the uncertainty
surrounding the deal by using phrases like, there are still
important due diligence items to be reviewed by both parties and
the terms and conditions of the final agreement could vary
substantially from those contemplated in the Letter of Intent. On
the plus side it says that the parties have spent considerable time
and effort to review the potential transaction and the basic terms
for its completion have been agreed to. But by failing to
disclose the basic terms of the deal and any financial information
about TeleWrx, CVRG makes it impossible for investors to attempt to
rationally value the deal (even if one assumes the successful
completion of the deal).
SLEUTH’S BOTTOM LINE
I started by asking, From the Ashes, the Phoenix? In other
words, is CVRG the story of a failed dot-com that crashes and burns,
and re-emerges as the beautiful phoenix from the ashes, as the stock
price suggests?
At this point in time, you can put me down as an extreme doubter.
We know that before the announced deal (which may or may not
happen) the stock was worth $.08 per share. We also know, that the
deal faces at least what might be called normal deal risk. By
implication, should the deal fail, a stock price of $.08 per share
may not be far behind.
But what if the deal closes successfully. Well, then we have no
idea how many shares are to be issued to the holders of TeleWrx, how
much revenue it has, how much profit it has (if any), or how the
deal is to be financed, if necessary? We do know that over the years
CVRG has sold nearly 9,000,000 shares of stock to insiders for an
average price of just over $.04 per share and that those sales
occurred over two years ago. Most, if not all, of those shares are
eligible for sale under rule 144K which provides for sales of
restricted shares without disclosure. My instincts tell me that the
failure to disclose more information about the deal is a deliberate
ploy designed to feed the frenzy.
The facts of this case clearly suggest to me that when the terms
of the deal (once again assuming it closes) are disclosed, investors
will be disappointed; rationality will re-appear, and CVRG will once
again return to a low double-digit penny stock.
DISCLAIMER:
I do not guarantee in any way that I am providing all of the
information that may be available and relevant to any investment
decisions you may make. I recommend that you do your own due
diligence before buying or selling any security.
At any time I may and frequently will hold a position in any of
the securities profiled in Sleuth's Case. I will not report when a
position is initiated or covered. Each investor must make that
decision based on his/her judgment of the market.
To contact Sleuth directly, send inquiries
to:
otcbb_sleuth@excite.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES,
LTD. (OTCBB: CARA) January 21, 2002 Current Price:
$4.24 Market Cap: Approximately 90 million
dollars
By: Sleuth
CARA--A Rocket Ship Dragging a Checkered Past, a
Mountain of Debt, and Near Financial Insolvency
A mere 14 trading days ago (December 28, 2001) CARACO
PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, LTD. experienced what had been a very
typical trading day, closing at $.97 per share on a measly 5,000
shares of trading volume. This trading pattern being right in line
and consistent with CARA's previous 90 days or so, during which CARA
traded between $.68 and $.97 on daily trading volumes of between 200
and 48,000 shares.
But what has happened since has been nothing short of
spectacular. On Friday, January 18th, CARA traded up to $4.27 and
closed at $4.24 per share (up $.64 on the day) on over 250,000
shares (which is consistent with CARA's average trading volume since
Dec. 28th of approx. 220K shares per day).
This kind of trading activity in an OTCBB stock is exactly what
attracts the attention of Sleuth. So lets have a look inside CARA to
see what's going on here.
THE FACTS OF THE CARA CASE:
A Brief History
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. ("Caraco" or the
"Corporation") is a corporation organized under Michigan law in
1984, to engage in the business of developing, manufacturing and
marketing generic drugs for the ethical (prescription) and
over-the-counter (non-prescription or "OTC") markets.
In 1990 CARA borrows approximately $9.1 million from the Economic
Development Corporation of the City of Detroit (the "EDC"), for use
in funding the direct costs of acquiring land and constructing
thereon the Corporation's pharmaceutical manufacturing facility and
executive offices. The facility is completed in 1992.
From 1993 to 1996, Caraco's efforts are spent developing its
marketing and sales capabilities, building sales and product
acquisition relationships with pharmaceutical purchasers,
distributors and suppliers, and obtaining adequate financing with
which to fund its operations.
In 1997, in connection with CARA's default on its EDC loan, the
balance of the loan (approx. $8.88M) is restructured. CARA receives
a moratorium from all payments until Feb. 1999. However, all
interest on the loan continues to accrue.
Also in 1997, an Indian specialty pharmaceutical company, Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. ("Sun Pharma") purchases 5,300,000
shares of CARA for $7.5M. Sun Pharma will also receive 544,000
shares of CARA for up to 25 products that Sun Pharma will sell to
CARA over the next five years.
In 1998, Sun Pharma agrees to lend CARA up to $5.3 million at an
annual interest rate of 10%. As of December 31, 1998, CARA borrows
$300,000 of the $5.3 million. CARA also raises $1,161,000 through
the private sale of 1,319,317 common shares (approx. $.88 per
share). Accrued interest on the EDC loan as of Dec. 31, 1998 is
$510,000.
In 1999, CARA once again defaults on its EDC loan and attempts to
renegotiate its terms again (accrued interest as of Dec. 31, 1999 is
up to $2,732,050). CARA borrows the remaining $5M from the Sun
Pharma $5.3M credit line and obtains a new $2M line from Sun Pharma
and borrows $850,000 against the $2M line. Sun Pharma earns
3,626,666 shares of CARA in return for selling CARA 6.67 products.
CARA also raises $396,000.00 000 through the private sale of 412,362
common shares (approx. $.96 per share).
In 2000, while continuing to renegotiate its EDC loan, CARA
pays $2.3M to the EDC and accounts for it as a reduction of
principle to $6.58M (accrued interest as of Dec. 31, 2000 is up to
$3,441,011). Sun Pharma "assists" (guarantees) CARA in obtaining
line of credit loans from ICICI Bank Limited and The Bank of Nova
Scotia, each in the amount of up to $5.0 million, of which CARA
borrows $5M and $3.85M respectively. CARA repays Sun Pharma $200,000
of the $850,000 CARA borrowed in 1999. Sun Pharma begins selling
CARA 2 additional products and has received a total of 4,714,682
shares for 8.67 products through Dec. 31, 2000 (increasing Sun
Pharma's stake to approx. 48% of CARA). In July 2000, CARA receives
a warning letter from the FDA relating to deviations and/or
deficiencies in the "current good manufacturing practices" ("cGMP").
The area of concern relates to record-keeping systems, testing
standards, staff training and proficiency and quality systems.
In 2001, while continuing to renegotiate its EDC loan, CARA pays
$.9M to the EDC and accounts for it as a reduction of principle to
$5.68M (accrued interest as of Sept. 30, 2001 is up to $4,042,430).
CARA borrows another $300,000 from Sun Pharma and extends its credit
line with The Bank of Nova Scotia up to $10M, then borrows an
additional $5.45M against the line increasing its outstanding debt
to the bank to $9.3M. In March and April of 2001 CARA underwent FDA
inspections and is in substantial compliance with cGMP. Subsequent
to the inspection of the facility, the FDA has granted its approval
of three products for manufacture and sale.
SUMMARY BALANCE SHEET DATA (Sept. 30, 2001): CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS $80,684
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS $3,426,792 NET PROPERTY, PLANT &
EQUIPMENT $6,782,472
TOTAL ASSETS $10,209,264
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES $11,679,358 TOTAL LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES $20,835,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES $32,514,358
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT $(22,305,094)
OPERATING RESULTS (NINE MONTHS ENDED Sept. 30, 2001) Sales $
3,372,686 Gross Profit $ 468,495
Selling, General &Administration $ 2,155,051 Research
& Development $ 1,934,456 Net Interest expense $ 1,510,843
NET LOSS $ 5,131,857 EPS $(.024)
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2000, the Corporation had 58 full-time
employees, of which 13 are engaged in research and development, 9 in
quality assurance, 2 in quality control, 6 in administration, 3 in
sales and marketing, 3 in materials management, 3 in facility
management, and 19 in manufacturing.
RECENT ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Monday January 14, 8:29 am Eastern Time
Caraco Expects Record Sales for December 2001
DETROIT, Jan. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Caraco Pharmaceutical
Laboratories, Ltd. (OTC Bulletin Board: CARA) expects to post record
sales for December 2001, Narendra N. Borkar, Chief Executive
Officer, announced today.
For the first time since the Company's inception and based on
preliminary unaudited results, net sales are expected to cross the
million-dollar mark and reach $1,031,000 for the month of December
2001, compared to $230,000 for December 2000.
Mr. Borkar said, ``The robust sales rise was attributable
primarily to the strong growth of the existing product line and the
introduction of three new drugs during the year, after correcting
Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) deficiencies.'' The Company's
FDA cGMP standing was restored in April 2001.
Mr. Borkar added, ``The Company's focus on new-product
development and augmenting manufacturing activity to achieve
sustainable growth in sales will continue. Over the last six months,
the Company has received four generic- drug approvals from the FDA
and a fifth generic drug has just been granted approvable status.
The Company has an additional five generic drugs pending FDA
approval and expects approvals for the majority of these by the
year-end.
The Company receives technologies for the development of new
generic products from Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited (Sun)
of Mumbai (formerly Bombay). Sun is a major shareholder in Caraco
and is currently ranked as India's fifth largest specialty
pharmaceutical company. Recently, Forbes Global ranked Sun on its
list of Best 200 Small Global Companies (with revenues under $500
million). Sun is one of the three pharmaceutical companies from
India to appear in this listing.
Detroit-based Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., develops,
manufactures and distributes generic and private-label prescription
drugs to the nation's largest wholesalers and distributors,
drugstore chains and healthcare systems.
Monday January 7, 8:32 am Eastern Time
Caraco Pharmaceutical Receives First FDA Drug Approval of 2002
Five Drugs Pending FDA Approval
DETROIT, Jan. 7 /PRNewswire/ -- Caraco Pharmaceutical
Laboratories, Ltd. (OTC Bulletin Board: CARA) has received approval
from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to manufacture and
market oxaprozin tablets. Oxaprozin is the generic form of G.D.
Searle's Daypro. The total U.S. market for oxaprozin is estimated at
$168 million. The drug is used in the treatment of rheumatoid
disease.
Caraco Pharma last month received a letter of approvability from
the FDA to produce metformin hydrochloride, which is the generic
form of Bristol Myers Squibb's Glucophage, a drug of choice for the
treatment of diabetes. In 2001, the Company also received FDA
approval to manufacture and market three additional generic drugs:
carbamazepine (chewable), a generic form of Novartis' Tegretol;
clonazepam, a generic form of Roche's Klonopin; and flurbiprofen, a
generic form of Pharmacia's Ansaid.
Narendra N. Borkar, Chief Executive Officer, said Caraco has five
additional drugs pending FDA approval and expects to receive
approvals for the majority of these by yearend.
Caraco has an extensive R&D Center at its Detroit
headquarters complex and receives R&D support from Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., India's fifth largest pharmaceutical
firm, headquartered in Bombay. Sun is a Caraco stockholder and has
agreed to supply Caraco with technology for upwards of 25 generic
drugs. To date, Caraco has received technology for 10 products.
Wednesday January 2, 11:09 am Eastern Time
Caraco Pharmaceutical Receives Preliminary Drug Approval From FDA
Five Drugs Pending FDA Approval
DETROIT, Jan. 2 /PRNewswire/ -- Caraco Pharmaceutical
Laboratories, Ltd. (OTC Bulletin Board: CARA) has received notice
from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that its application to
manufacture and market metformin hydrochloride tablets is
approvable.
Metformin hydrochloride, which is used in the treatment of
diabetes, is the generic form of Bristol Myers Squibb's Glucophage.
The total U.S. market for metformin hydrochloride is estimated at
$1.8 billion.
Caraco Pharmaceutical last year received FDA approvals to
manufacture and market three generic drugs, carbamazepine (chewable
form) clonazepam, and flurbiprofen. The Company's drug formulary
comprises 12 drugs.
Narendra N. Borkar, Chief Executive Officer, said Caraco has five
additional drugs pending FDA approval and expects to receive
approvals for the majority of these by yearend.
Caraco has an extensive R&D Center at its Detroit
headquarters complex and receives R&D support from Sun
Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., a specialty pharmaceutical firm in
India. Sun is a Caraco stockholder and has agreed to supply Caraco
with technology for 25 generic drugs. To date, Caraco has received
technology for nine products.
Detroit-based Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., develops,
manufactures and distributes generic and private-label prescription
drugs to the nation's largest wholesalers and distributors,
drugstore chains and healthcare systems.
Sleuth's Take On The Facts
First, my apology for reliving so much of CARA's history in what
is supposed to be a Brief History, but the essence of the CARA story
compelled it. You see, CARA's three most recent announcements, all
released since its run began on Dec. 29, are fairly impressive. And
one suspects are what's driving the stock. But investors are
behaving as if CARA's history began on Jan. 2, 2002 and are ignoring
its previous 12 years of operation and its effect on present
franchise value.
If one takes the long view of CARA, what we see here is a Company
that has spent the last 12 years trying to gain a toe hold in the
generic drug trade. And since 1990, when the EDC of Detroit lent
CARA $9.1M, and then 1997, when Sun Pharma got heavily involved
financially, CARA has had a deep pocketed partner at its side. So
unlike most OTCBB companies, CARA can't blame its failures on
inadequate financing.
A consistent operating pattern has emerged over the past 12 years
in which CARA borrows money to operate, loses it, then borrows some
more. Prior to 2002, the only things of note CARA has done (besides
consistently losing money) is to default on its EDC loan, get a
reprimand from the FDA "relating to deviations and/or deficiencies"
in its "record-keeping systems, testing standards, staff training
and proficiency and quality systems", and to persuade Sun Pharama to
continue to pour more and more money (approx. $30M - including loan
guarantees - as of Sept. 30, 2001) into what looks like the
black-hole of CARA.
In fact, the only way to understand the CARA story, is to
intimately understand CARA's near 5 year relationship with Sun
Pharma. Plain and simple, Sun Pharma's financial lifeline is and has
been the only thing that stands between CARA and bankruptcy. As of
Sept. 30, 2001, Sun Pharma owned nearly half (approx. 48%) of CARA.
It also has outstanding direct loans to CARA totaling $6.25M and has
guaranteed on behalf of CARA another $14.3M in outstanding term
loans from ICICI Bank of India and the Bank of Nova Scotia. Plus, as
part of the restructured EDC loan, the EDC was granted a continuing
security interest in all of CARA's assets. Which places the EDC
obligations of $5.68M principle and $4M in accrued interest in front
of Sun Pharma in the financial pecking order.
Sleuth's Bottom Line:
The critical question investors need to ask is:
"Where will Sun Pharma's best interest take the CARA relationship
from here and why should Sun Pharma care about CARA's other common
shareholders?"
Investors can take comfort, that bankruptcy seems unlikely,
because CARA's bankruptcy would be a financial disaster for Sun
Pharma, wiping out $15M from its balance sheet and triggering the
repayment of $14.3M in off balance sheet (the Enron method of
accounting) guaranteed loans.
Assuming, Sun Pharma really believes in CARA, the most likely
outcome of the relationship, is the acquisition of CARA by Sun
Pharama. This is probably the best outcome that CARA shareholders
can realistically expect. The bad news for investors though is, "why
would Sun Pharma pay $5 per share for the CARA shares it doesn't
already own, when it could pay $1?"
Because of all of CARA's debt an acquisition price of $1 per
share would cost Sun Pharma over $40M:
$9.68M to EDC $14.3M to ICICI Bank of India and the Bank of
Nova Scotia $11M to the other CARA common stock holders
$6.25M in forgiven debt to Sun Pharma
The bottom line is, in an acquisition transaction, which is the
best CARA shareholders can expect, Sun Pharma's interest departs
from the interest of other shareholders. Sun Pharma's interest is
best served by paying as little as possible for CARA's other
outstanding shares, while CARA's other shareholders best interest is
served by Sun Pharma paying as much as possible. Unfortunately for
CARA shareholders not named Sun Pharma, they can't win a struggle
with Sun Pharma over control of CARA, because Sun Pharma is the only
shareholder keeping CARA alive, while the rest are merely along for
the ride.
With Sun Pharma's support, CARA is worth somewhere in the
neighborhood of $1 to $1.50 per share (approximate price Sun Pharama
paid for its CARA holdings). Without Sun Pharma's support, CARA is
worth NOTHING. Time will tell which direction Sun Pharma decides to
take CARA.
Disclaimer:
I do not guarantee in any way that I am providing all of the
information that may be available and relevant to any investment
decisions you may make. I recommend that you do your own due
diligence before buying or selling any security.
At any time I may and frequently will hold a position in any of
the securities profiled in Sleuth's Case. I will not report when a
position is initiated or covered. Each investor must make that
decision based on his/her judgment of the market.
To contact Sleuth directly, send inquiries
to:
otcbb_sleuth@excite.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
HumaTech, Inc. (OTCBB: HUMT) December
20, 2001 Current Price: $1.72 By
"Sleuth"
How to Make a Stock Go Up 350% in 12
Trading Days in One Easy Lesson The Dramatic Rise (and Fall ?)
of HumaTech, Inc.
December 4,
2001, was a typical, uneventful trading day for HumaTech, Inc.
It traded 66.4K shares in a price range of $.41 - $.55 per share,
closing at $.54.
But WOW, what a difference 16 days
makes. As of this writing on December 20, 2001,HUMT is well on
its way to trading 2M shares with a trading top of at $1.80 per
share and a closing price of $1.72.
The $64,000 question is:
What has fueled the meteoric rise in share price and trading volume
for a tiny Company that makes "an all-natural source of trace
elements for use in animal feeds" and how long will it
continue?
The Facts of the HUMT
Case:
Humatech, Inc. was originally incorporated in
the State of Illinois on February 2, 1988 under the name of Midwest
Enterprise Consultants, Inc. as a
consulting and marketing service company. From our inception until
April 1997, we were engaged primarily in the business of providing
consulting services.
On April 6, 1997, we acquired all of
the assets and certain liabilities from International Humate
Fertilizer Co., a Nevada Corporation located in Mesa, Arizona and
wholly-owned by our Chairman, David G. Williams. On May 5, 1997, we
changed our name to HumaTech, Inc. to more accurately reflect our
new business of the development, manufacture, and sale of
carbon-based animal feed supplements and fertilizer products.
Capitalization
April 6, 1997: 2.520,500 shares to
owners of Midwest Enterprise Consultants in shell merger
April 6, 1997: 5,884,614 shares to
owners of HumaTech in shell merger Prior to April 30, 1998: 50,000 for consulting
service May 2000: 77,000 shares to
Linzy Capital, Inc. of Las Vegas, Nevada for financial
services June 2000: 77,778 shares to
White Mountain Capital Group, LLC of Highland, Utah @ $.90 per
share August 2000: 44,000 shares to
four shareholders for various services September 2000: 439,096
shares to U.S. Finance, Inc., a corporation affiliated with John D.
Rottweiler, the Company's Vice President and CFO, in payment of
outstanding debt @ $.60 per share September 2000: 1,007,030 shares to John Duke
Rottweiler, son of John D. Rottweiler, the Company's Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer, in payment of outstanding debt @ $.60
per share September 2000: 77,500 shares @ $.645 per
share December 2000: 50,000 shares @ $.60 per share February
2001: 62,500 shares @ $.40 per share March 2001: 33,334 shares @
$.60 per share March 2001: 35,500 shares @ $.40 per
share February 2001: 13,000 shares to Wall Street Daily Press
Services for the performance of financial services March 2001:
18,741 shares @ $.40 per share May 2001: 75,000 shares @ $.40 per
share June 2001: 300,000 shares to a consultant for
services June 2001: 25,000 shares to the Company's Corporate
Counsel for legal services July 31, 2001: 33,334 shares @ $.60
per share August 2001: 1,375,000 shares @ $.40 per
share August 2001: 350,000 shares to a consultant for
services August 2001: 25,000 shares to the Company's Corporate
Counsel for legal services September 2001: 15,000 shares to a
consultant for services October 2001: 500,000 shares to Robert P.
Atwell, a consultant for services November 2001: 1,000,000 shares
to Philip W. Johnston, a consultant for services November 2001:
50,000 shares to the Company's Corporate Counsel for legal
services November 2001: 1,000,000 warrants exercisable at $1.00
per share to Marc Barhonovich, a consultant for services November
2001: 500,000 warrants exercisable at $1.50 per share to Triway
Assets, a consultant for services November 2001: 500,000 warrants
exercisable at $1.50 per share to David Caney, a consultant for
services
Total outstanding as of December 17, 2001:
14,111,593 shares. Market cap. approx. $24M @
$1.70
Summary Balance Sheet data (Oct. 31, 2001):
Cash
on hand and in
bank
$ 67,387 TOTAL
ASSETS
$755,386
Current maturities of long-term
debt $65,443 Accounts
payable -
trade
$130,283 TOTAL
LIABILITIES
$1,678,179
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
$(922,793)
Summary Statement of Operations (Quarter ending
Oct. 31, 2001):
Sales $106,429 Cost of Goods Sold
$68,301 Gross Profit $38,128
Operating expenses
$633,471 LOSS FROM OPERATIONS $(595,343)
Employees
As of August 7, 2001, we employed a total of seven full-time
and two part-time employees, two of which were officers, 3 of which
were engaged in manufacturing activities, 3 of which were engaged in
sales activities, and one of which was engaged in administrative
activities.
Recent SEC Filings
10Q on 12/19/01 for
quarter ending Oct. 31, 2001
S-8 on 12/6/01 - Registers for
sale: 1.05M shares (Philip Johnston's 1M and 50,000 for the
Company's lawyer which were paid in November 2001) , 1M warrants @
$1 per share for Marc Barhonovich & 1M warrants @ $1.50 per
share for Jesse Ortega & David Caney.
S-8 on 10/30/01 -
Registers for sale: 500,000 shares for Robert P. Atwell received in
October 2001, and 81,000 additional shares.
S-8 on 9/21/01 -
Registers for sale: 350,000 shares for Christopher Johnson received
in August 2001, and 25,000 shares for Corporate
Counsel
Recent Announcements
December 17, 2001:
"HumaTech Hires Business Development
Consultants"
"In an announcement today, David Williams,
CEO of HumaTech Inc. (OTCBB:HUMT), stated, ``After the devastation
caused by last year's Hoof and Mouth disease in the UK, HumaTech's
management made the determination to increase the sales force in
such a way as to more aggressively spread the company's sales over a
broader geographical base. In November, a strategic plan was
initiated to begin that process. We released our Promax line for
sale in the USA. Timed with that release we put to work new business
development consultants to promote the company's all-natural Promax
line of products to distributors and customers in foreign and U.S.
markets. These business consultants have contacted businesses
worldwide, and introduced them to our Promax line of products. More
face-to-face meetings have been held with the animal feed industry
companies than at any time in our history.
"As a result, our
company and distributors have received strong new interest in Promax
from over 20 companies in 11 countries on 5 continents. We are
adding new Promax clients weekly, and current customers are
consistently re-ordering Promax. Revenues are on the rise, and we
anticipate this increased interest in our products to generate
strong growth. We are pleased with these early
results."
Sleuth's Take On The
Facts
The only news to have been released by the
HUMT over the past month is the announcement of December 17, 2001
announcing, "HumaTech Hires Business Development Consultants".
Here's the HUH, HUH "really big news" from the release:
HUMT
PR: "we put to work new business development consultants to promote
the company's all-natural Promax line of products to distributors
and customers in foreign and U.S. markets" SLEUTH'S TAKE: We gave
some guys mountains of free trading stock to work part-time and make
some phone calls for us.
HUMT PR: "These business consultants
have contacted businesses worldwide, and introduced them to our
Promax line of products" SLEUTH'S TAKE : They've actually
contacted some people and introduced them to our
product.
HUMT PR: "More face-to-face meetings have been held
with the animal feed industry companies than at any time in our
history" SLEUTH'S TAKE: Holy cow! People are even giving us
appointments.
HUMT PR: "As a result, our company and
distributors have received strong new interest in Promax from over
20 companies in 11 countries on 5 continents" SLEUTH'S TAKE:
Prospects have such a strong interest that they're even asking us
questions about our stuff.
HUMT PR: "We are adding new Promax
clients weekly, and current customers are consistently re-ordering
Promax. Revenues are on the rise, and we anticipate this increased
interest in our products to generate strong growth" SLEUTH'S TAKE:
We're even realizing some revenue, not profits though, from
the nearly 2M shares of stock and 2M warrants we've given away since
August 2001.
I mean, is it me, or are the kind of events described
in this release merely the kind of things that one might describe
as the "normal course of business"? Other than the issuance of
all of the new stock and warrants, I fail to see anything even
resembling materiality here.
Sleuth's Bottom
Line
I started by asking, "How to Make a Stock Go Up
350% in 12 Trading Days in One Easy Lesson"?
The HUMT model appears
to be to throw mountains of free trading stock at an army of
aggressive promoters and let them pull out all of the stops to MOVE
THE STOCK. Then watch it go.
In fairness, HUMT isn't
the first Company, nor will it be the last, to resort to aggressive
promotion to get its stock moving. The trouble is, the
promoters don't add any real intrinsic value to the Company.
They just artificially and temporarily stimulate demand for an
issue, in this case HUMT. Meanwhile, the promoters bring real
and permanent dilution to the Company through the issuance of new
stock and warrants. In the case of HUMT, it may be as much as
30% (around 12M shares outstanding before paying out nearly
2M shares plus 1M warrants @ $1 and 1M @ $1.50).
The only
question in my mind regarding HUMT is, "How long will the stock take
to return to $.40 per share level - which is the price paid by the
cash investors that put up $550,000 for 1.375M shares in August
2001?" My guess is around the time HUMT files its next
10Q.
Disclaimer
I do not guarantee in any
way that I am providing all of the information that may be available
and relevant to any investment decisions you may make. I recommend
that you do your own due diligence before buying or selling
any security.
At any time I may and frequently will hold
a position in any of the securities profiled in Sleuth's Case. I
will not report when a position is initiated or covered. Each
investor must make that decision based on his/her judgment of the
market.
To contact Sleuth directly,
send inquiries to:
otcbb_sleuth@excite.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burrard
Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: BTGS) Current
Price: $2.10 November 26,
2001
What Makes a Shell Worth
$35,000,000? Damned
if I know!
Having been around Wall Street for awhile, I thought
that I had seen it all. But then along comes BURRARD
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (OTCBB: BTGS), a company that can most
kindly be described as a $35M public "shell". On the surface,
it doesn't seem to make any financial sense to value a public
"shell" at $35M, when a "shell" can generally be purchased for
between $200,000 - $300,000. But before rushing to judgement,
it makes sense to look below the surface, to see if maybe
there is some "hidden" intrinsic value.
The facts of the BTGS case
A Brief History BTGS was incorporated on April 5, 2000
under the laws of the state of Nevada and its principal
offices are located at Suite 1500, 885 West Georgia Street,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3E8.
BTGS Capitalization
April 5, 2000: 2.5M common shares issued @ $.001 per share
= $2,500 June 30, 2000: 3.0M common shares issued @ $.01
per share = $30,000 Aug. 9, 2000: 229K common shares
issued @ $.10 per share = $22,900
Oct. 2, 2001: 3 for 1 stock split increases total issued
and outstanding to 17.19M common shares for total
consideration of $55,400.
BTGS's original (and latest) business plan (from Nov. 19,
2001 10QSB):
Our plan of operations for the twelve months following the
quarter ended September 30, 2001 is to complete the following
objectives within the time period specified, subject to our
obtaining financing for the development and marketing of our
International Reg portal web site:
* Complete the development of the Chinese language domain
name registration software;
* Complete the development of the International Reg
Internet web portal site;
* Complete the development of our network operations and
our Internet services provider infrastructure;
* Commence marketing of our International Reg domain name
registration services;
* Hire additional employees and engage third party
consultants to enable us to complete development of our
business plan.
BTGS Management (from Nov. 19, 2001 10QSB)
Our officers and directors, Mr. William Robertson and Mr.
Nick Sirsiris, presently devote only 50% of their business
time to the management of our business. There is no assurance
that either Mr. Robertson or Mr. Sirsiris will be able to
devote sufficient amounts of their business time to enable us
to implement our business plan. If Mr. Robertson and Mr.
Sirsiris do not devote a sufficient amount of their business
time to the management of our business, then our business may
fail.
Summary Balance Sheet data (Sept. 30, 2001):
Cash: $46 Total assets: $46
Accounts payable: $47,151 Due to related party: $42,607
Total liabilities: $89,758 Shareholder's equity:
$(89,712)
Recent Announcements
Nov. 19, 2001: "Agreement in Principle Reached to Acquire
Technocall"
"BURRARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the "Company"') announces that
it has reached an agreement in principal to acquire 100% of
the issued and outstanding shares of Technocall SA in
consideration of the issuance of 7.6 million restricted shares
of the Company's common stock.
Technocall SA is a Swiss company incorporated in 1992 whose
primary business is research and development of electronic
devices. It has developed and manufactured a smart chip
designed to manage and control water treatment systems called
the e-BI.
Sleuth's Take On The Facts
OK, so what are the facts of the case trying to tell us
about BTGS?
First, the timing of BTGS's incorporation (April 2000) and
the nature of its original business plan suggest that BTGS was
founded to catch the Internet wave. But as the saying goes,
"timing is everything" and BTGS showed up to catch the
Internet wave, just as the wave was crashing onto the beach.
So the Company essentially floundered around for the next year
and a half, with a part-time Senior Management team, trying to
raise capital to execute its Internet plan or alternatively,
looking for a "new story" to tell.
Second, BTGS's recent announcement of an Agreement in
Principle to Acquire Technocall, suggests that BTGS believes
it has found its "new story" to tell and is now hoping to
catch and ride the bio-terrorism wave.
Third, according to BTGS's press release "Technocall's
primary business is research and development" and has agreed
to be acquired by BTGS for 7.6 million restricted shares of
BTGS common stock (constituting a mere 30% of the combined
entity). Both items suggest that Technocall brings little to
no revenue and limited intrinsic value to the table.
Fourth, BTGS was capitalized with a lot of very cheap
common stock (2.5M shares @ $.001, 3.0M shares @ $.01, and
.229M @ $.10 on a pre-split basis).
Fifth, as good as the deal was that BTGS's original
investors got, it was made a whole lot better on Oct 2, 2001,
when BTGS split its common stock on a 3 for 1 basis.
Sixth, since all of the 17.19M (post 3 for 1 split) common
shares were acquired and issued on or before Aug. 9, 2000, the
shares qualify for the rule 144 one year holding period and
can be sold immediately, subject to certain volume
restrictions.
Seventh, BTGS's Sept. 30, 2001 balance sheet indicates BTGS
had $46 in the bank on that date. This suggests that BTGS must
raise additional capital, which will most likely be
accomplished through the sale of stock or of some convertible
debt instrument. Either option will cause further dilution to
existing common shareholders.
Sleuth's Bottom Line
Here's Sleuth's bottom line on BTGS. Given limited to no
intrinsic value for the post-acquisition Company and gobs and
gobs of very cheap and immediately sellable insider shares, it
seems highly unlikely that BTGS will be able to maintain a
near term (3 months) market capitalization at anywhere near
its present level of approximately $35M pre-acquisition and
approximately $50M post-acquisition. To try to put things in
perspective I try to imagine what I would do, if I was one of
those lucky BTGS insiders who owns a nice chunk of those 9M
common shares with a cost basis of one third of a penny per
share. It's not difficult for me to imagine being very eager
to get to the gate with BTGS at $2 / share and remaining a
very aggressive seller of BTGS all the way down to $.05 (if
not lower). Who wouldn't be, when even at $.05 per share,
they'd be making 15 times on their original investment of
$.003 per share.
Come to think of it, on a post-split basis, every one of
the 17.19M pre-acquisition shares has a cost basis of less
than $.05 per share and has met the 144 holding period of 1
year. With the last round of investors (Aug. 9, 2000) having
the dubious distinction of owning the fewest and most
expensive shares, 687,000 shares and $.0333 per share,
respectively. However, with BTGS at over $2 per share, you
won't find me crying any crocodile tears for those poor
unfortunate souls.
Late Breaking BTGS News
Nov. 23, 2001 - Although the Friday after Thanksgiving is
always a very slow news and trading volume day, one company,
CARTIS (pink sheets: CART) decided to release a news item at
10:26 AM EST. Below is the complete text of the Business Wire
release:
Friday November 23, 10:26 am Eastern Time
Press Release
SOURCE: CARTIS Inc.
$62 Million Agreement Between CARTIS and Technocall SA
PALM BEACH, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 23, 2001--CARTIS
Inc.(The Company)(OTC:CART) is pleased to announce that it has
reached an agreement for technical cooperation with Technocall
SA estimated at USD 62 million.
This agreement reached on September 28th 2001, and
confirmed today, will ensure CARTIS revenues of USD 17 million
and Technocall revenues of USD 45 million over a period of 5
years. It is estimated that the Company will reach revenues of
USD 10 million in 2002 with a net profit of USD 4 million.
Technocall SA, which is in the process of being acquired by
Burrard Technologies,Inc. (OTCBB:BTGS), supplies Cartis with
its "e-BI" (Electronic Intelligent Management Module) smart
chip technology, necessary for the management of all water
treatments.
Safe Harbor statement under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1955: This release contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express
or involve discussion with respect to predictions,
expectations ,beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals,
assumptions or future events or performance are not statements
of historical facts may be forward- looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on expectations,
estimates and projections at the time the statements are made
to involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could
cause actual results or events to differ materially from those
presently anticipated.
Contact:
CARTIS Inc., Palm Beach Fernand Leloroux, 011 33 4
50 66 98 61
Sleuth's Take On The Late Breaking News
On its face, this seems like to pretty straightforward
announcement. CARTIS and Technocall in a deal valued at $62M
over fives years with $17M going to CARTIS and $45M going to
Technocall.
But alas, in the world of the OTCBB - and now with the
CARTIS deal an intrinsic part of the story, the saga of BTGS
has descended into the even deeper muck of the Pink Sheets -
things are rarely what they seem.
For openers, does anyone believe that it is merely
coincidental, that the BTGS story is being constructed upon
two pillars, Technocall SA (a private Swiss company) and now
CARTIS (a Pink Sheet company) that DO NOT file ANY public
disclosure documents?
How does "an agreement for technical cooperation" turn into
$62M in revenue?
Does anyone believe that a deal between a Pink Sheet
company (CARTIS) and a "research and development" company
(Technocall SA) can "ensure CARTIS revenues of USD 17 million
and Technocall revenues of USD 45 million over a period of 5
years"? I'm absolutely shocked that CARTIS chose to use the
word ensure in the context of a forward looking statement. I
mean Ford and Firestone can't ensure five year revenue levels
between them, but CARTIS and Technocall can. Yea, right!
OK. Shine the best possible light on the deal and assume
that Technocall is really "ensured" - their word, not mine -
of receiving $45M in revenue over the next five years. If that
is so, how stupid are the Technocall folks for selling out to
the BTGS folks for only 30% of the otherwise empty "shell"?
Remember, if the news is accurate, the "$45M ensured revenue
agreement" was reached on Sept. 28, so Technocall had the deal
in hand while negotiating with BTGS.
The release says "This agreement reached on September 28th
2001, and confirmed today". What kind of agreement requires a
subsequent "confirmation" some two months later or was the
"confirmed today" item a transparent excuse to conveniently
release the news in the midst of a BTGS pump run?
Lastly, the release says that CARTIS is in Palm Beach FL
and the contact person is Fernand Leloroux, but the phone
number to call is 011 33 4 50 66 98 61. So why would CARTIS, a
Florida based company, have an overseas contact to call?
I began coverage of BTGS by observing that I thought I had
seen everything there was to see on Wall Street before
uncovering the unfolding saga of BTGS. With this latest news
release from CARTIS, BTGS has once again demonstrated an
ability to shock even old Wall Street professionals.
Disclaimer
I do not guarantee in any way that I am providing all of
the information that may be available and relevant to any
investment decisions you may make. I recommend that you do
your own due diligence before buying or selling any security.
At any time I may and frequently will
hold a position in any of the securities profiled in Sleuth's
Case. I will not report when a position is initiated or
covered. Each investor must make that decision based on
his/her judgment of the market.
To contact Sleuth directly, send
inquiries to:
otcbb_sleuth@excite.com
|