• Home
  • Disclaimer
  • News And Analysis
  • Message Board
  • Tools
  • Featured Offers
  • Registration
  • Forgot Password?
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs
  • About Us
  • Privacy
  • Premium Members
  • Testimonials

    I'm an active trader of the Qs and hot Nasdaq names. It's my job. I use LSR's information to help me prepare for the day. Mauck's T/A seems to be right on target. Salim and the other columnists have excellent ideas too. I use other well known services for idea flow and I may cancel them soon. This is one of the best market sites on the web. Great job, LSR.

    -John Hartman
    Institutional Trader
    Chicago,

    "I didn’t start making money in the stock market until I subscribed to LSR’s service."

    - Don
    Individual Trader
    New Jersey

    "After years of being bombarded with offers to join stock picking services, Long and Short Reports is the first and only service worth its weight in return on investment. LSR provides me with critical insight to market technicals, plus all the LSR stock selections I need to prosper, Bull or Bear."

    - Dennis Duff
    Short Term Investor
    Canada

    " I'm very happy with the service you're providing and I'm learning something new every day...I've traded on and off since 1987....my first experience with a crashing market...and have a pretty solid technical background in TA, so I'm familiar with most of the lingo you use...I really like your disciplined money management approach"

    - Andrew K
    Individual Trader and Investor
    Florida

    "I just wanted to thank you guys. I was looking at buying a hot OTCBB stock that had fallen some in price, but then I noticed Robert Church had written a negative report on the company in your Dead Fish section. It caused me to put the idea aside. The stock has now crashed. You were right and it saved me a bundle."

    - Ron Squire
    Portland, Oregon

    Caution: Bumpy Market Changes Ahead in
    Pharmaceuticals

    By:  Matt Groesbeck, Long and Short Reports Staff Writer
    March 28, 2002

    Watch out: a $5 billion industry will soon split in half.

    Prescription insurance companies won a major battle against pharmaceuticals this month the moment Schering-Plough (SGP: NYSE) announced its Major League Baseball endorsed Claritin, an allergy medication with more than $2 billion annual revenue, is headed over-the-counter at year's end.
    (
    http://www.sgp.com/news/2002/business/20020308.html)

    Other Claritin competitors, Allegra (Aventis, AVE:NYSE)  and Zyrtec (Pfizer, PFE:NYSE), may be OTC-bound by second quarter 2003 before they're literally pushed there by the FDA, if not dropped on their heads first by insurance carriers. Cue the end of the golden age of second generation non-drowsy antihistamines ---Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec. The industry will take a beating in the transition. Analysts say market share will  dramatically decrease by more than 50 percent, some of which may be impossible to recoup on OTC store shelves.

    That's why Schering-Plough is getting a jump on things now by not only releasing Claritin over-the-counter, but wisely patenting a new third-generation prescription metabolite of Claritin, Clarinex, which is touted as more effective than the original.

    The press release: "The proposed conversion of Claritin to OTC status represents a strategic business and medical decision...to introduce a safe, non-sedating antihistamine into the OTC marketplace; position these products as the premier brands in the prescription and OTC categories, respectively; and maximize the combined value of the CLARITIN and
    CLARINEX brands."

    Duh.

    These measures are proof that Schering-Plough has no doubt looked for ways to cut their losses ever since insurance carrier Wellpoint complained to the FDA in 2000 about the high prices of non-drowsy antihistamines. What was argument of big insurance? Put simply, they asked 'If Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec are so safe, so non-sedating and better than anything we have now over-the-counter in terms of allergy drugs, why in heaven's name aren't they over-the-counter too? Why can't more people have access to these drugs?' The match that was struck lit a big fire with the FDA and the media mid-2001 if you recall. The heat was on to make Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec available OTC.

    In other words, the overzealous marketers of the pharmceutical giants got burned. Sure they were overly arrogant about their product, but they were innocently touting the factual benefits of their drugs. Oops. Apparently they said too much. Now their product is headed OTC. A similar situation may exist with this year's patent expiration of the stomach-acid inhibitor Prilosec (AstraZeneca, AZN:NYSE).

    But marketers are fighting back to keep as much market share as possible. Take Schering-Plough's case for instance. By establishing Claritin's presence over-the-counter first, Schering-Plough may be able to claim a special place in the minds of allergy-ridden consumers and command premium shelf space. They had to get to the OTC market first before Pfizer and Aventis to gain the advantage. And it was even more imperative
    that they hit the market before generic competition from Johnson & Johnson and American Home Products strips them even more after the prized Claritin patent expires December, 2002.

    But by developing the prescription metabolite Clarinex in the same non-drowsy market Claritin was once in, Schering-Plough can soften their losses. Their marketers are keen on exposure, of course, so you'll soon be seeing ads on both drugs for both markets, if you haven't already.

    Claritin posted sales of $2.7 billion last year, but is expected to lose a good portion of future revenue to copycat generic products marketed by Johnson & Johnson, American Home Products and generic store brands.

    The antihistamine market ranked 11th largest in the world in 2000, worth $5.5 billion. It grew 18 percent over 1999 in US dollar terms, according to IMS HEALTH's World Review.

    Claritin has led this corner of the prescription allergy industry with a 39 percent market share, which will obviously tank soon after it's released OTC. Look for market share to plummet even more as Claritin competes head-to-head with generics as well. Zyrtec (Pfizer) follows with 21 percent of the market, and Allegra (Aventis) ranks third with a 15 percent market
    share.

    As reported in Schering-Plough press releases on Dec. 21, 2001, and Jan. 24, 2002, they continue to expect "to achieve a percentage increase in earnings per share in the low double-digits."

    Projections aside, the bottom line for Schering-Plough stock is a hard one to read. I believe the OTC demand is there for Claritin, and Schering-Plough is doing well to reach their marketing window. The key to living up to pro forma is pricing it right.

    When Claritin is released OTC this November, it may be priced anywhere from $15 to $25 for a month supply. Generics may be priced two to five dollars cheaper. That may be a bargain considering the only other antihistamines available without a prescription can inflict that dreaded enemy of day-time functionality: drowsiness. The culprits? - Benadryl
    (Diphenhydramine), Tavist (Clemastine), Chlor-Trimeton (Chlorphenarimine), Bromfed (Brompheniramine).

    Current OTC allergy drugs act with what health professionals call "anti-cholinergic" side effects, otherwise known as somnolence, dizziness, drowsiness and other central nervous system effects. And even though some of these brands market themselves in "non-drowsy" incarnations only after including the decongestant/stimulant pseudoephedrine, there's a good
    chance sedation may override the stimulant effect anyway. It's either that or you're wired depending on how your body responds, a catch-22 with non-selective, first-generation allergy drugs.

    That's why the Claritin release is such a revelation for the OTC antihistamine market. Finally there will be a drug that is truly non-drowsy and available at any drug store. Insurance companies are loving it. They won't have to dish out the $5 billion or more to pay for prescription Claritin and its followers. For the allergy antihistamine industry to rebound, third-generation drugs stronger than Clarinex will have to be developed and milked, just as Claritin was.

    The removal of Claritin from insurance company formulary lists may prevent some state welfare patients from getting the drug for a $1 co-pay, forcing them to dish out the cash to purchase Claritin over-the-counter. The easy remedy for welfare patients, of course, is to ask their doctors to prescribe Clarinex which would be paid for, (but that would only increase welfare abuse and increase insurance company premiums, but that's an entirely different social dilemma.) Which reminds me - time to pay taxes this month. And it's allergy season.

    Schering-Plough shares closed yesterday at $31.20.


    Hey Dude, Where's My Earnings?: Dell Reports Q4

    By Matt Groesbeck, Long and Short Reports Staff Writer
    February 17, 2001

    Right on target, dude.

    After the closing Valentines Day bell, Dell Computer Corp  (Nasdaq:  DELL). reported fourth quarter earnings above the projected mark with $8.1 billion in sales revenue, although down 7 percent from 2001 fourth quarter reports.

    And with the Feb. 11 announcement of a fan-requested website for Dell's right hand "dude" in marketing, 21-year-old actor Benjamin Curtis who plays "Steven" on Dell television spots, Dell's heart to sell PC's continues to set the pace of the digital pulse of the nation.
    ( http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/TV/01/31/dell.guy/index.html )

    The website, at www.dell4me.com/dude, was created at customer requests, and is proof that Dell's marketing efforts have successfully connected with the public. The newest "Dude" spot can be seen at the fan website, as
    well as information on the Dell system that Curtis uses, an Inspiron  4100 notebook.

    From Dell's "Dude" Feb. 11 press release: "The Steven character has been a terrific messenger for Dell ...and through customer response to the advertisements is a great advocate for what a consumer is looking for in a
    computer company, namely affordable technology built just for their needs with great prices and service," said David Marmonti, vice president of marketing for Dell's Consumer Group. "We're thrilled to hear from customers that he's so popular, and in response to their requests for more information, we're launching this fan site."

    Personally, I like the kid, and have even looked into buying a Dell computer, but not because of him.

    I like the fast PC's, the black boxes and the warranty, and the fact that Consumer Reports Magazine says Dell actually backs it up. Dell has the highest approval rating in customer service of any computer hardware retailer.

    That's probably why Dell is the frontrunner of the entire computer hardware industry, extending its lead in both the U.S. and worldwide markets with more than 14 percent of worldwide shipments, and a full 25 percent of domestic shipments--that's double its nearest rival Compaq, according to Gartner Dataquest.

    Dell's market cap of $71.3 billion is second largest in its industry, behind titan International Business Machines (IBM) at $186.2 billion. Hewlett-Packard Corp. chimes it at the industry's third largest at a $40.7 billion cap.

    Revenue for the Dell's past four quarters totaled $31.8 billion. Dell ranks No. 48 on the Fortune 500, No. 122 on the Fortune Global 500 and No. 7 on the
    Fortune Global "most admired" lists of companies.

    Although suffering slumping sales post Sept. 11, Dell still leads the pack out of the so-called "PC depression," even gaining market share from rival Compaq and Hewlett Packard Computers.

    While overall PC sales fell 12 percent worldwide in the third quarter of 2001 from a year ago, Dell's sales increased. Last year, CNET.com reported "the PC market is shrinking, while Dell Computer continues to gain market share."

    Thus, the rise of Dell in the personal computer industry is picking up pace. Just in laptop sales alone, some analysts think today that one in four sold are Dell. This may be an underestimation of Dell's influence, simply because of the increasing market noise coming from a plethora of small competitors with cheaper deals.

    Computer prices have decreased steadily with the rest of the market, and Dell has followed the pricing dive, but has refused to dip below $799.00 for a new system depending on the specifications, although refurbished Dell systems can cost less.

    Compaq (NYSE: CPQ) trails Dell in PC market share at 10 percent. Gateway (NYSE: GTW) follows with 7 percent market share. IBM(NYSE:IBM) and HP (NYSE: HWP) are both at about 6 percent market share. NEC holds about 3 percent while all other PC makers hold 60 percent of the market, according to Gartner Dataquest's 2001 estimates.

    Apple's recent I-Mac upgrade received a lot of media attention in it's 2002 debut. However, Apple's market share is much a smaller, albeit very dedicated niche.  Apple only retains about five percent of the market share in personal computers in the U.S., but has grabbed a 10 to 20 percent market share overseas.

    It would seem that Dell is a portfolio must-have, especially considering that
    this year's consensus growth estimates target a modest 13.6 percent. Next year's forecast is for growth of 16 percent.

    But at $25.60 a share, Dell stock price isn't that far from it's 52-week high of $31. A dip in Dell's share price could occur most likely in some sort of continued Nasdaq back-peddle. LSR's Mauck has his finger on the pulse
    of the Composite, so stay tuned to his commentary. I would watch for a trough in the index, and then try to snatch up some DELL dude!.


    Biometrics Hype Draws Attention to Security Sector Stocks

    By Matt Groesbeck
    Long and Short Reports Staff Writer
    December 11, 2001

    Looking to catch the long ball with more than 15 percent annual growth, or perhaps waiting for another industry revolution? Or do you just want to sell em' short to make a quick buck?

    Take your pick in the security industry, where you can do both and still make a profit.  If you time them right,  it's hard to lose by going long or short in this industry, because security hype, motivated chiefly by Sept. 11, has not only generated a huge demand for better security technology, but has also driven the industry's stock prices into a state of hyper-inflation in the past 90 days.

    The hype is called biometrics, a technology only recently sprouting in the security industry. Technophiles claim to have developed biometric technology in the past five years to an amazingly proficient level, where intricate patterns of facial, voice, eye and fingerprint patterns are readily recognized, cross-referenced, and tracked. Now, as humans remain hypnotized with technology, technology can glare back.

    Biometrics received a lot of attention at the COMDEX recently, the United States' largest technology convention scheduled in Las Vegas the first week of December ( http://www.comdex.com ). New biometric products ranged from palm readers to iris scanners, clearly marking the focus of the convention on security.

    And it's a focus that will not disappear in the near future. Security preparations for the 2002 Winter Olympics have doubled, and airport security legislation is just now taking affect. Call it what you will, the strengthening of the symbiotic link between man and machine based on fear, or simply another hyped technology,  investors have nonetheless gravitated toward security equities.

    Like the tech industry during the first Internet revolution, high-tech security is overvalued with little or no earnings to back it up. Biometrics is the place where the technology is rapidly evolving, but the actual implementation of said technology remains light, for now.

    No airport in the United States has facial recognition or other advanced biometric technology yet, but they say it's coming soon to an airport near you, thanks to airport-security legislation. Sure, airports may mobilize labor forces and security companies quickly. They may have better bag scanning and tracking technology. But it'll be a few years before the more advanced biometric technologies of facial, voice and fingerprint recognition come into mainstream use ( www.technologyreview.com )

    That's why I think many of these overvalued security stocks may revisit the vacuum they created once they ventured into territory of unmerited value. Sure, a huge demand has been created for increased security with a single terrorist act, but overpriced security stocks could temporarily fall back from their terribly artificial and fear-driven post-Sept 11. highs. That will happen just as soon as the boys realize this corner of the market's earnings aren't measuring up at this time, and that the sector is overbought. Take a look at the astronomical multiples of InVision Technologies (NASDAQ: INVN) and Viisage Technologies (NASDAQ: VISG), with P/E's of 440.14 and 237.96 respectively. The rest of the industry, whether high-tech, home security, or the rent-a-cop variety, currently linger in the 30 to 90 multiple range, or have no earnings at all.

    Long-term, however,  security industry stock price trends could move steadily higher, even with the inherent volatility which is present in some of the sector's more controversial issues.  Public relations, and the ever-growing demand and utility for biometrics, should send this corner of the security industry anywhere but down, unless a retaliatory terrorist act conducted where such systems are installed causes the public to call into question the value of the technology. But even if that happens, the ever-growing need for better security will become even more evident.  The industry may break it's own record highs in the next two years.

    One such company taking advantage of the security craze is Visionics Corp. of Jersey City, N.J., (NASDAQ: VSNX). VSNX nearly quadrupled to $14 after 9-11. Visionics produces a facial recognition system dubbed 'FaceIt' that automatically compares any face with electronic photographs stored in any host of databases.

    Visionics is not only aggressively selling FaceIt to the United States government; they're doing business with governments abroad too. Israeli officials use FaceIt to "manage the flow of individuals entering and exiting the Gaza Strip," according to a company statement. And Mexico recently bought FaceIt software to double-check duplicate voter registrations. The United Kingdom used FaceIt linked with some 300 cameras two years ago to search for known criminals. UK officials credit Visionics with a 34 percent drop in crime, which has sparked several UK cities to purchase the software.

    And if you don't think facial recognition will affect you, think again. Experts say the technology will eventually saturate the marketplace from ATM's to casinos to the DMV.

    Some banks use facial recognition to help identify ATM users, which experts say will eventually eliminate the need for passwords or PINs. Casinos use facial recognition software to look for known cons and thieves as soon as they walk in the door. India has the first airport in the world to use facial recognition to search for terrorists.

    And nationwide DMV's are snagging facial recognition software to verify the identities of applicants by matching current and past photographs. Facial recognition was even used during the Super Bowl to scan the crowds for known criminals.

    Rep. Alan B. Mollohan (D-W.Va.) says the potential of the biometric technology is tremendous. "…One measure is the growing interest in applying this technology to achieve other law-enforcement missions." The war against terrorism essentially has another weapon.

    Viisage (NASDAQ: VISG) aims to sell its technology to most U.S. airports specifically for law enforcement functions. However, the company reports their technology is only being used on a "limited basis." Viisage is one of the security industries' most heavily traded, with an average volume of more than 2 million shares. It now trades at $13.47 a share.

    New York-based Kroll Inc. (NASDAQ: KROL) is also riding the wave. It offers myriad security services, including background checks, surveillance and investigative operations. Kroll stock has more than doubled from the seven-dollar range, and now trades at $16.49.

    Are there other downsides to the security industry besides volatility? Yes. Civil liberties activists began criticizing the proliferation of high-tech security in airports and commerce as a major privacy issue, just a week after Sept. 11. These groups question how accurate biometrics claims to be,  and how successful the systems will be in actually deterring terrorism and domestic crime. They say the number of false positives and negatives may abound, and that no biometric system is 100 percent accurate.  Privacy will therefore remain a concern just as it always has with technology, but security companies and politicians will be sure to be sensitive and tactful in addressing the issue. ( http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/ptech/11/15/comdex.biometric/index.html)