|
Caution: Bumpy Market Changes
Ahead in Pharmaceuticals
By: Matt
Groesbeck, Long and Short Reports Staff Writer March 28,
2002
Watch out: a $5 billion industry will soon
split in half.
Prescription insurance companies won a
major battle against pharmaceuticals this month the moment
Schering-Plough (SGP: NYSE) announced its Major League Baseball
endorsed Claritin, an allergy medication with more than $2 billion
annual revenue, is headed over-the-counter at year's end. (http://www.sgp.com/news/2002/business/20020308.html)
Other Claritin competitors, Allegra
(Aventis, AVE:NYSE) and Zyrtec (Pfizer, PFE:NYSE), may be
OTC-bound by second quarter 2003 before they're literally pushed
there by the FDA, if not dropped on their heads first by insurance
carriers. Cue the end of the golden age of second generation
non-drowsy antihistamines ---Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec. The
industry will take a beating in the transition. Analysts say market
share will dramatically decrease by more than 50 percent, some
of which may be impossible to recoup on OTC store
shelves.
That's why Schering-Plough is getting a
jump on things now by not only releasing Claritin over-the-counter,
but wisely patenting a new third-generation prescription metabolite
of Claritin, Clarinex, which is touted as more effective than the
original.
The press release: "The proposed
conversion of Claritin to OTC status represents a strategic business
and medical decision...to introduce a safe, non-sedating
antihistamine into the OTC marketplace; position these products as
the premier brands in the prescription and OTC categories,
respectively; and maximize the combined value of the CLARITIN
and CLARINEX brands."
Duh.
These measures are proof that
Schering-Plough has no doubt looked for ways to cut their losses
ever since insurance carrier Wellpoint complained to the FDA in 2000
about the high prices of non-drowsy antihistamines. What was
argument of big insurance? Put simply, they asked 'If Claritin,
Allegra and Zyrtec are so safe, so non-sedating and better than
anything we have now over-the-counter in terms of allergy drugs, why
in heaven's name aren't they over-the-counter too? Why can't more
people have access to these drugs?' The match that was struck lit a
big fire with the FDA and the media mid-2001 if you recall. The heat
was on to make Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec available
OTC.
In other words, the overzealous marketers
of the pharmceutical giants got burned. Sure they were overly
arrogant about their product, but they were innocently touting the
factual benefits of their drugs. Oops. Apparently they said too
much. Now their product is headed OTC. A similar situation may exist
with this year's patent expiration of the stomach-acid inhibitor
Prilosec (AstraZeneca, AZN:NYSE).
But marketers are fighting back to keep
as much market share as possible. Take Schering-Plough's case for
instance. By establishing Claritin's presence over-the-counter
first, Schering-Plough may be able to claim a special place in the
minds of allergy-ridden consumers and command premium shelf space.
They had to get to the OTC market first before Pfizer and Aventis to
gain the advantage. And it was even more imperative that they hit
the market before generic competition from Johnson & Johnson and
American Home Products strips them even more after the prized
Claritin patent expires December, 2002.
But by developing the prescription
metabolite Clarinex in the same non-drowsy market Claritin was once
in, Schering-Plough can soften their losses. Their marketers are
keen on exposure, of course, so you'll soon be seeing ads on both
drugs for both markets, if you haven't already.
Claritin posted sales of $2.7 billion
last year, but is expected to lose a good portion of future revenue
to copycat generic products marketed by Johnson & Johnson,
American Home Products and generic store brands.
The antihistamine market ranked 11th
largest in the world in 2000, worth $5.5 billion. It grew 18 percent
over 1999 in US dollar terms, according to IMS HEALTH's World
Review.
Claritin has led this corner of the
prescription allergy industry with a 39 percent market share, which
will obviously tank soon after it's released OTC. Look for market
share to plummet even more as Claritin competes head-to-head with
generics as well. Zyrtec (Pfizer) follows with 21 percent of the
market, and Allegra (Aventis) ranks third with a 15 percent
market share.
As reported in Schering-Plough press
releases on Dec. 21, 2001, and Jan. 24, 2002, they continue to
expect "to achieve a percentage increase in earnings per share in
the low double-digits."
Projections aside, the bottom line for
Schering-Plough stock is a hard one to read. I believe the OTC
demand is there for Claritin, and Schering-Plough is doing well to
reach their marketing window. The key to living up to pro forma is
pricing it right.
When Claritin is released OTC this
November, it may be priced anywhere from $15 to $25 for a month
supply. Generics may be priced two to five dollars cheaper. That may
be a bargain considering the only other antihistamines available
without a prescription can inflict that dreaded enemy of day-time
functionality: drowsiness. The culprits? -
Benadryl (Diphenhydramine), Tavist (Clemastine), Chlor-Trimeton
(Chlorphenarimine), Bromfed (Brompheniramine).
Current OTC allergy drugs act with what
health professionals call "anti-cholinergic" side effects, otherwise
known as somnolence, dizziness, drowsiness and other central nervous
system effects. And even though some of these brands market
themselves in "non-drowsy" incarnations only after including the
decongestant/stimulant pseudoephedrine, there's a good chance
sedation may override the stimulant effect anyway. It's either that
or you're wired depending on how your body responds, a catch-22 with
non-selective, first-generation allergy drugs.
That's why the Claritin release is such a
revelation for the OTC antihistamine market. Finally there will be a
drug that is truly non-drowsy and available at any drug store.
Insurance companies are loving it. They won't have to dish out the
$5 billion or more to pay for prescription Claritin and its
followers. For the allergy antihistamine industry to rebound,
third-generation drugs stronger than Clarinex will have to be
developed and milked, just as Claritin was.
The removal of Claritin from insurance
company formulary lists may prevent some state welfare patients from
getting the drug for a $1 co-pay, forcing them to dish out the cash
to purchase Claritin over-the-counter. The easy remedy for welfare
patients, of course, is to ask their doctors to prescribe Clarinex
which would be paid for, (but that would only increase welfare abuse
and increase insurance company premiums, but that's an entirely
different social dilemma.) Which reminds me - time to pay taxes this
month. And it's allergy season.
Schering-Plough shares closed yesterday
at $31.20.
Hey
Dude, Where's My Earnings?: Dell Reports
Q4
By Matt Groesbeck, Long and Short
Reports Staff Writer February 17, 2001
Right on target,
dude.
After the closing Valentines Day
bell, Dell Computer Corp (Nasdaq: DELL). reported fourth quarter
earnings above the projected mark with $8.1 billion in sales
revenue, although down 7 percent from 2001 fourth quarter
reports.
And with the Feb. 11 announcement
of a fan-requested website for Dell's right hand "dude" in
marketing, 21-year-old actor Benjamin Curtis who plays
"Steven" on Dell television spots, Dell's heart to sell PC's
continues to set the pace of the digital pulse of the
nation.
(
http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/TV/01/31/dell.guy/index.html
)
The website, at www.dell4me.com/dude, was created at
customer requests, and is proof that Dell's marketing efforts
have successfully connected with the public. The newest "Dude"
spot can be seen at the fan website, as well as information
on the Dell system that Curtis uses, an Inspiron 4100
notebook.
From Dell's "Dude" Feb. 11 press
release: "The Steven character has been a terrific messenger
for Dell ...and through customer response to the
advertisements is a great advocate for what a consumer is
looking for in a computer company, namely affordable
technology built just for their needs with great prices and
service," said David Marmonti, vice president of marketing for
Dell's Consumer Group. "We're thrilled to hear from customers
that he's so popular, and in response to their requests for
more information, we're launching this fan site."
Personally, I like the kid, and
have even looked into buying a Dell computer, but not because
of him.
I like the fast PC's, the black
boxes and the warranty, and the fact that Consumer Reports
Magazine says Dell actually backs it up. Dell has the highest
approval rating in customer service of any computer hardware
retailer.
That's probably why Dell is the
frontrunner of the entire computer hardware industry,
extending its lead in both the U.S. and worldwide markets with
more than 14 percent of worldwide shipments, and a full 25
percent of domestic shipments--that's double its nearest rival
Compaq, according to Gartner Dataquest.
Dell's market cap of $71.3 billion
is second largest in its industry, behind titan International
Business Machines (IBM) at $186.2 billion. Hewlett-Packard
Corp. chimes it at the industry's third largest at a $40.7
billion cap.
Revenue for the Dell's past four
quarters totaled $31.8 billion. Dell ranks No. 48 on the
Fortune 500, No. 122 on the Fortune Global 500 and No. 7 on
the Fortune Global "most admired" lists of
companies.
Although suffering slumping sales
post Sept. 11, Dell still leads the pack out of the so-called
"PC depression," even gaining market share from rival Compaq
and Hewlett Packard Computers.
While overall PC sales fell 12
percent worldwide in the third quarter of 2001 from a year
ago, Dell's sales increased. Last year, CNET.com reported "the
PC market is shrinking, while Dell Computer continues to gain
market share."
Thus, the rise of Dell in the
personal computer industry is picking up pace. Just in laptop
sales alone, some analysts think today that one in four sold
are Dell. This may be an underestimation of Dell's influence,
simply because of the increasing market noise coming from a
plethora of small competitors with cheaper deals.
Computer prices have decreased
steadily with the rest of the market, and Dell has followed the pricing dive, but has
refused to dip below $799.00 for a new system depending on the
specifications, although refurbished Dell systems can cost
less.
Compaq (NYSE: CPQ) trails Dell in
PC market share at 10 percent. Gateway (NYSE: GTW) follows
with 7 percent market share. IBM(NYSE:IBM) and HP (NYSE: HWP)
are both at about 6 percent market share. NEC holds about 3
percent while all other PC makers hold 60 percent of the
market, according to Gartner Dataquest's 2001 estimates.
Apple's recent I-Mac upgrade
received a lot of media attention in it's 2002 debut. However,
Apple's market share is much a smaller, albeit very dedicated
niche. Apple only retains about five percent of the
market share in personal computers in the U.S., but has
grabbed a 10 to 20 percent market share overseas.
It would seem that Dell is a
portfolio must-have, especially considering that this
year's consensus growth estimates target a modest 13.6
percent. Next year's forecast is for growth of 16
percent.
But at $25.60 a share, Dell stock
price isn't that far from it's 52-week high of $31. A dip in
Dell's share price could occur most likely in some sort
of continued Nasdaq back-peddle. LSR's Mauck has his finger on
the pulse of the Composite, so stay tuned to his commentary.
I would watch for a trough in the index, and then try
to snatch up some DELL dude!.
Biometrics
Hype Draws Attention to Security Sector
Stocks
By Matt
Groesbeck Long and Short Reports Staff
Writer December 11,
2001
Looking to catch the long ball with more than
15 percent annual growth, or perhaps waiting for another
industry revolution? Or do you just want to sell em' short to
make a quick buck?
Take your pick in the security industry, where
you can do both and still make a profit. If you time
them right, it's hard to lose by going long or
short in this industry, because security hype, motivated
chiefly by Sept. 11, has not only generated a huge demand for
better security technology, but has also driven the industry's
stock prices into a state of hyper-inflation in the past
90 days.
The hype is called biometrics, a technology
only recently sprouting in the security industry. Technophiles
claim to have developed biometric technology in the past five
years to an amazingly proficient level, where intricate
patterns of facial, voice, eye and fingerprint patterns are
readily recognized, cross-referenced, and tracked. Now, as
humans remain hypnotized with technology, technology can glare
back.
Biometrics received a lot of attention at the
COMDEX recently, the United States' largest technology
convention scheduled in Las Vegas the first week of
December ( http://www.comdex.com ). New biometric products
ranged from palm readers to iris scanners, clearly marking the
focus of the convention on security.
And it's a focus that will not disappear in
the near future. Security preparations for the 2002 Winter
Olympics have doubled, and airport security legislation is
just now taking affect. Call it what you will, the
strengthening of the symbiotic link between man and machine
based on fear, or simply another hyped technology,
investors have nonetheless gravitated toward security
equities.
Like the tech industry during the first
Internet revolution, high-tech security is overvalued with
little or no earnings to back it up. Biometrics is the place
where the technology is rapidly evolving, but the actual
implementation of said technology remains light, for
now.
No airport in the United States has facial
recognition or other advanced biometric technology yet, but
they say it's coming soon to an airport near you, thanks to
airport-security legislation. Sure, airports may mobilize
labor forces and security companies quickly. They may have
better bag scanning and tracking technology. But it'll be a
few years before the more advanced biometric technologies of
facial, voice and fingerprint recognition come into mainstream
use (
www.technologyreview.com )
That's why I think many of these overvalued
security stocks may revisit the vacuum they
created once they ventured into territory of unmerited
value. Sure, a huge demand has been created for increased
security with a single terrorist act, but overpriced security
stocks could temporarily fall back from their
terribly artificial and fear-driven post-Sept 11. highs. That
will happen just as soon as the boys realize this corner of
the market's earnings aren't measuring up at this time, and
that the sector is overbought. Take a look at
the astronomical multiples of InVision Technologies (NASDAQ:
INVN) and Viisage Technologies (NASDAQ: VISG), with P/E's of
440.14 and 237.96 respectively. The rest of the industry,
whether high-tech, home security, or the rent-a-cop variety,
currently linger in the 30 to 90 multiple range, or have no
earnings at all.
Long-term, however, security
industry stock price trends could move steadily
higher, even with the inherent volatility which is
present in some of the sector's more controversial
issues. Public relations, and the ever-growing demand
and utility for biometrics, should send this corner of
the security industry anywhere but down, unless a retaliatory
terrorist act conducted where such systems are installed
causes the public to call into question the value of the
technology. But even if that happens, the ever-growing need
for better security will become even more evident.
The industry may break it's own record highs in the next two
years.
One such company taking advantage of the
security craze is Visionics Corp. of Jersey City, N.J.,
(NASDAQ: VSNX). VSNX nearly quadrupled to $14 after 9-11.
Visionics produces a facial recognition system dubbed 'FaceIt'
that automatically compares any face with electronic
photographs stored in any host of databases.
Visionics is not only aggressively selling
FaceIt to the United States government; they're doing business
with governments abroad too. Israeli officials use FaceIt to
"manage the flow of individuals entering and exiting the Gaza
Strip," according to a company statement. And Mexico recently
bought FaceIt software to double-check duplicate voter
registrations. The United Kingdom used FaceIt linked with some
300 cameras two years ago to search for known criminals. UK
officials credit Visionics with a 34 percent drop in crime,
which has sparked several UK cities to purchase the
software.
And if you don't think facial recognition will
affect you, think again. Experts say the technology will
eventually saturate the marketplace from ATM's to casinos to
the DMV.
Some banks use facial recognition to help
identify ATM users, which experts say will eventually
eliminate the need for passwords or PINs. Casinos use facial
recognition software to look for known cons and thieves as
soon as they walk in the door. India has the first airport in
the world to use facial recognition to search for terrorists.
And nationwide DMV's are snagging facial
recognition software to verify the identities of applicants by
matching current and past photographs. Facial recognition was
even used during the Super Bowl to scan the crowds for known
criminals.
Rep. Alan B. Mollohan (D-W.Va.) says the
potential of the biometric technology is tremendous. "…One
measure is the growing interest in applying this technology to
achieve other law-enforcement missions." The war against
terrorism essentially has another weapon.
Viisage (NASDAQ: VISG) aims to sell its
technology to most U.S. airports specifically for law
enforcement functions. However, the company reports their
technology is only being used on a "limited basis." Viisage is
one of the security industries' most heavily traded, with an
average volume of more than 2 million shares. It now trades at
$13.47 a share.
New York-based Kroll Inc. (NASDAQ: KROL) is
also riding the wave. It offers myriad security services,
including background checks, surveillance and investigative
operations. Kroll stock has more than doubled from the
seven-dollar range, and now trades at $16.49.
Are there other downsides to the security
industry besides volatility? Yes. Civil liberties activists
began criticizing the proliferation of high-tech security in
airports and commerce as a major privacy issue, just a week
after Sept. 11. These groups question how accurate biometrics
claims to be, and how successful the systems will be in
actually deterring terrorism and domestic crime. They say the
number of false positives and negatives may abound, and that
no biometric system is 100 percent accurate. Privacy
will therefore remain a concern just as it always
has with technology, but security companies and politicians
will be sure to be sensitive and tactful in addressing the
issue. ( http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/ptech/11/15/comdex.biometric/index.html)
|